Planning for Life

Court Allows Claim Against Goulston & Storrs to Proceed to Trial

Posted by Harry S. Margolis on December 22, 2020

By Harry S. Margolis


The Suffolk Superior Court in Ginsberg v. Casey, et al. (C.A. No. 1984CV01670-BLS1, November 10, 2020) dismisses some claims and refuses to dismiss others brought by Faye Ginsburg against Goulston & Storrs, P.C., and Attorneys J. Robert Casey and Andrew D. Rothstein for assisting her brother, Bruce Ginsberg, in raiding family trusts for his benefit and convincing their mother to change her estate plan to Faye's detriment.

Read More

Topics: probate, will, undue influence, malpractice

Estate Planning Attorneys Beware -- Massachusetts

Posted by Harry S. Margolis on December 29, 2012

last-will-and-testament-estate-planning-attorney-Wellesley-MA-02481By Harry S. Margolis

Estate planning attorneys in Massachusetts have long been protected from liability for their mistakes by the fact that the people usually harmed are the potential beneficiaries of the estate, rather than the client for whom they drafted the will or trust. Beneficiaries who lose out have no standing to bring a malpractice action against the attorney because they didn't hire the allegedly negligent lawyer in the first place.

But now the Massachusetts Appeals Court has said that while a beneficiary may have no malpractice claim in the absence of an attorney-client relationship, he can sue as the intended third-party beneficiary of the contract between the attorney and the decedent to create an estate plan.

Read More

Topics: Massachusetts, Estate Planning, malpractice

Subscribe to New Blog Posts

Recent Posts

Most Popular Posts

Posts by Topic

see all

Have More Questions? Contact Us